In the first #NewYorkPost article the day after #AshleyStClair announced her #baby with #ElonMusk, she claimed that she didn’t initially have an “much of an interest in Elon” until after she met him in May 2023 at an interview at #Twitter HQ. But there she is on May 2nd, 2023, telling @IsabellaIsMoody that she wants to be funny for Elon in order to have his “rocket babies.” This date is important.We already knew the Babylon Bee is fake opposition that #gatekeeps #Christians. That’s been obvious for some time now, ever since the guy who bought it from its founder unmasked himself. But the extent to which its subversive activities go, and its apparent influence over other #fake #media #conservatives, was not previously suspected.
That meeting with Elon Musk at Twitter HQ was on May 22–3 weeks after telling Isabella she wanted Elon’s babies. IOW, she lied in the Post article about not being interested in Elon until after she met him. Strange. It looks like she’s constructing a false #narrative to make it look like their romance was innocent & spontaneous after having met. Why would she need to do that unless it wasn’t actually innocent & spontaneous?
But the plot thickens a little more. #SethDillon, CEO of the #BabylonBee, is the one that facilitated her meeting Elon IRL. He had her fly out for that Babylon Bee interview with Elon, as Ashley noted in the Post article and confirmed by Ashley’s own tweet from May 22, 2023.
But Ashley wasn’t ultimately pictured in the Bee’s announcement of the interview with Elon, nor did she participate in the video interview itself at any point. This sort of begs the question: why did Seth Dillon fly her out to meet Elon?
Is it because Dillon is part of an #israeli #influence #operation himself as some–including myself–have suggested?
Watching Jordan Peterson – it’s hard not to conclude that #VoxDay had it right from day one. Mentally unwell people can provide the stray insight that is unique, worth hearing. But they are not role models or gurus. It’s always a mistake to take a strange person and create a cult around him. This is basically also the problem of #feminism – a handful of #angry #lesbians convincing healthy #young #women to live against their instincts.The thing that was so #frustrating for me about the general #enthusiasm for #Peterson was that it was based upon virtually nothing, and all of the contrary #evidence was right out there on display. Literally all you had to do to know he was an #evil, #vainglorious #nutbag was read either of his two books.
I was put on another Ukrainian kill list. This one, funded by the US State Department, only containsdailystormer.in
I think it’s so funny that Korean women are so done with Korean men that they’re literally just deciding to die out. Y’all heard of the 4B movement. I’m a big fan. The 4B movement stands for these four things. It’s basically Korean feminism which is cheaper and more efficient.Except #Korea will not die. The Korea that will survive is #BestKorea. Scientific, evolutionarily-superior Korea. It’s very unlikely that South Korean women will be permitted to simply die off and end Korean civilization, the odds significantly favor them instead being #enslaved and #utilized by the North Koreans to ensure #national #survival. And the great #irony is that these women will apparently be #happier as #slaves than as #free #women allowed to pursue any path they wanted, because, when given complete freedom to become anything they imagined, they consciously chose #rebellion against their #Creator and #suicide.
The #4B movement initially gained recognition on #Twitter in 2019 because of course it did, through various #feminist social media accounts and they are focused on envisioning a future without men because of course they are. The cornerstone of feminism is that everything is oppressive. The 4B movement had an Escape the Corset movement. The word corset is used here for the societal mechanisms that bind and repress women like toxic beauty standards. Just like in Western feminism, toxic means anything I don’t like. I need all of this from you but you need something from me, that’s toxic. Korean women literally just gave up on their men they’re like, they’re not going to change so we’re all going to go extinct.
That’s where she’s wrong. She says that Korean women are mad at Korean men, but they’re actually mad at God, and if you don’t like that word, just call it the universe or physics or whatever, it’s the same thing. This is a hierarchy of creation, it goes from God or the universe all the way down through man to woman to child to the natural world and all the way back up. It goes both ways. Basically the universe just is the way it is, you can’t get rid of gravity and men have to deal with that directly and build things from it, and we also give approval and attention and validation to women, who then provide nurturing to communities and children. Their role is to be the learners and they provide creativity and new ways in developing new things to do with the natural world, which is howwe get new things like the internet or different types of cheese or whatever, but in the same way that man cannot simply ignore the rules of gravity, women cannot simply ignore what men need from them either, otherwise we can’t do our jobs, that’s just how reality works.
S what these women are saying is I want resources and money and power and everything, I just don’t want to provide men with what they need in order to continue creating them. Usually what keeps this whole thing going is that men provide women with approval, attention, and validation, so basically if men don’t follow the rules of the universe, then they don’t get what they need from the universe. That’s just physically how life works, you need to know when to plant seeds and stuff, and usually when women don’t follow the rules made by men, and give men what they need, then men don’t provide women with what they need in return.
But now women have these cellphones that are providing them with all of this approval, attention, and validation, which makes them think “I don’t need men anymore” even though men are still making all the stuff, so because women are no longer providing this men are no longer providing that, which means no one can have any of these things and women are saying “okay we’d rather die”. that’s what quotes like this mean.
Rebellion is as the sin of Witchcraft because you have rejected the word of the Lord, He has also rejected you from being King. That means if you don’t do as the universe demands then you’re not going to get anything from it. So man has to build society according to the rules of reality and women have to fit into society according to the rules of society, and then children have get good grades or they don’t get the ice cream or whatever. It works the sameway. The Bible uses that word a lot, rebellious, and what that means is “I want the benefits but I’m not going to follow the rules,” that’s why this argument is so important. “I want you to provide me with things but I’m not going to provide anything back.”
Imagine if you were saying “I want food to grow, I’m just not going to do any farming,” that’s what this is illustrating. If you don’t do what you have to then you don’t get anything back, and if you don’t provide men with what they need in order to make food and fix buildings and stuff, then they’re not going to give you any of those things and then everyone die. I’m not saying that men don’t have work to do, I don’t know what’s going on in Korea, maybe the corset is too tight, maybe men need to start providing something new, but if it’s anything like American feminism, it’s probably all get-get-get and never “where are we getting this from” and every time you break that chain you just die off, which they literally are, by the way.
Korea has the lowest birthrates in the world but I just think that’s so funny… Korean as an ethnicity is about to go away. It works the same every time you fill your mind with entitlement, you blame somebody for what you don’t have, and then you use the government to take it away from them. When the government gives stuff to women for free, then women stop giving men support and men go “what’s the point” and then women go “what’s the point” and then well, bye-bye, Korea.
A WAR OF LIES
The war in Ukraine is based on lies — lies about how it started, how it’s going, and how it will end.
We are told that Ukraine is winning when in fact it is losing. We are told that the war makes NATO stronger when in fact it is depleting it. We are told that Ukraine’s biggest problem is a lack of funds from the U.S. Congress when in fact the West can’t produce enough ammunition — a problem that will take years to fix. We are told that Russia is suffering greater casualties when in fact Ukraine is running out of soldiers — another problem money can’t fix.
We are told that the world is with us when in fact the Global Majority believes U.S. policy is the height of folly. We are told that there is no opportunity to make peace when in fact we have rejected multiple opportunities for a negotiated settlement. We are told that if Ukraine keeps fighting, it will improve its negotiating position when in fact the terms will only get much worse than what was already available and rejected.
Nevertheless the lies will succeed in dragging out the war. Congress will appropriate more funds. Russia will take more territory. Ukraine will mobilize more young men and women to feed into the meat grinder. Discontent will mount. Eventually there will be a crisis in Kiev and the Zelensky government will be toppled.
And then, when the war is finally lost, when the whole country lays in smoldering ruins on a funeral pyre of their own making, the liars will say “well we tried.” Having prevented any alternative, having smeared anyone who told the truth as puppets for the enemy, the liars will say “We did our best. We stood up to Putin.”
In fact, they will claim, we would have succeeded but for the fifth column of Putin apologists who stabbed the Ukrainians in the back. Then, having shifted blame and patted themselves on the back, they will blithely move on to the next war, as they moved onto Ukraine after their disasters in Afghanistan and Iraq.
The lies are comprehensive — but they will work... continue reading
X owner Elon Musk today floated the idea that the social network formerly known as Twitter may no longer be a free site. In a live-streamed conversation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday, Musk said the company was “moving to a small monthly payment” for the use of the X system. He suggested that such a change would be necessary to deal with the problem of bots on the platform.“It’s the only way I can think of to combat vast armies of bots,” explained Musk. “Because a bot costs a fraction of a penny — call it a tenth of a penny — but even if it has to pay…a few dollars or something, the effective cost of bots is very high,” he said. Plus, every time a bot creator wanted to make another bot, they would need another new payment method.
Musk didn’t say what the new subscription payment would cost, but described it as a “small amount of money.”
Frankly, Elon Musk is a faggot. There is no freedom on Twitter. He saiddailystormer.in
I was never in Washington DC on January 6, 2021, nor did I work with or communicate with anyone who was involved in any of the activities that are subject to the J6 committee investigative authority.Here is one obvious application for #AI, which is to create fake shadow accounts that provide a false record of criminal activity. It will then be up to the accused to prove that he did not do what the record shows that he did.
I’m going to skip a lot of background noise, irrelevant legal stuff, jurisdictional issues, discoveries from discussions with lawyers and the experience gained in association with this ridiculous subpoena. I am going to focus on the biggest story within it.
Sticking to the information in the Red Box above, notice how the J6 committee has evidence, “public-source information and documents on file”, showing my participation, communication, and contact with people and technology that are material interests to the committee.
Here’s the kicker…. I had no clue what the hell they were talking about. There’s not a single aspect of their outline that I had any knowledge or connection of.
I had no idea what Zello was. I had no idea who 1% watchdog might be. I had never heard of “Stop the Steal J6” or associated “channel.” I had never heard of the person redacted, and I had never communicated with any Oath Keeper, any communication system, or platform, or anyone or anything – nothing – that is outlined in that subpoena.
Those points of evidence outlined in the subpoena had no connection to me at all.
The subpoena might as well have been asking me to appear in Michigan because my Red Ferrari was involved in a hit and run accident, during my trip to Detroit. I don’t own a Ferrari; I have never been to Michigan; I certainly never had an accident; I wasn’t on a trip and have never visited Detroit. The entire construct of their probable cause for the subpoena was silly. Complete and utter nonsense.
That said, how could there be “public records” and “documentary” evidence of something that never happened?
At first, I thought this was some silly case of mistaken identity and they just sent a subpoena to the wrong person. However, the investigators were adamant the evidence existed, and the need for testimony was required. After taking advice from several smart people, and after discovering the costs associated with just the reply to the committee and/or representation therein; suddenly I realized there might be more value for me in this subpoena than the committee. After all, how can there be public-records and documents that I own a red Ferrari and went to Michigan when I don’t and never did.
After several back and forths I discovered, through their admissions of their own research, and through documents they extracted as an outcome of their tasks to prove the merit of their claims, that someone inside #Twitter had created a fictitious identity of me associated with the networks and communications as the investigators described them.
In testimony to the House Judiciary Committee about the Twitter Files, a few words about why state-funded "anti-disinformation" and free speech can't coexist#TwitterFiles
Matt #Taibbi
Mar 9 2023
...The original promise of the Internet was that it might democratize the exchange of information globally. A free internet would overwhelm all attempts to control information flow, its very existence a threat to anti-democratic forms of government everywhere.https://www.racket.news/p/my-statement-to-congress
What we found in the Files was a sweeping effort to reverse that promise, and use machine learning and other tools to turn the internet into an instrument of censorship and social control. Unfortunately, our own government appears to be playing a lead role.
...
Anders sozial vernetzt – Alternativen zu Twitter, TikTok, Facebook und Co.nachzuhören unter [1] https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/marktplatz-29-12-2022-alternativen-zu-twitter-tiktok-facebook-und-co-dlf-b9ae9ddc-100.html
Gäste
Markus Beckedahl, Netzaktivist, netzreporter.org, Berlin
Peter Welchering, Journalist, Ostrhauderfehn
Klaudia Zotzmann-Koch. Mastodon-Instanz-Betreiberin, Wien
Am Mikrofon: Manfred Kloiber
[...]
Oft fristen alternative soziale Netzwerke ein Schattendasein, weil alle Nutzerinnen und Nutzer nur beim Marktführer aktiv sind – der gefürchtete Lock-in-Effekt tritt ein. Aber bei WhatsApp hat es funktioniert: Mit Signal, Threema und anderen haben sich konkurrierende Anbieter einen festen Platz auf Smartphones und Tablets erobert. Sie bieten eine echte Alternative zum beliebten Messagingdienst des Facebook-Mutterkonzerns Meta. Und bei Twitter befördert Elon Musks Engagement eine Absetzbewegung in Richtung des Netzwerkes Mastodon. Gibt es auch für Facebook und TikTok, dem Platzhirsch der Video-Posts, konkurrierende Netzwerke?